
We are
creatures of habit, and it is very easy to slip into joining our mates every
other day, doing the same loop on the days in between, and low and behold six
months have gone by. To improve, our bodies need to do something
different in training EVERY week. Something has to change, and that
something can be directed from a coach, based on what you need to change to
improve your performance. It takes a lot of time, and knowledge to
understand how to implement this, and while in the first two to three months it
is easy to do ourselves, it is more difficult when we have been riding awhile,
because we find it hard toassess what we really need, and what to do to
improve. Others usually see in us what we don't - it's human
nature.
I recommend
all riders who want to improve, to get a coach. No matter what your
level, or what your goals. If you want to improve but don't have a coach,
this is the easiest and quickest way to get where you want to go. Even if
you have been cycling for years, and don't think you need one - this is
in fact all the more reason to get one. Or as Karyn Palmer, our new Kinetic
Edge Nelson based coach says "random training produces random results" or "do
the same training, and you will get the same result."
When I first
started coaching I thought coaching was writing a training programme. How
wrong I was! I tried to coach like this, but it was not effective.
Yes sure it gave people a general framework to work from, but it did not
produce big results, because it was just numbers on a piece of paper based on
what they "should be doing." It did not assess their weaknesses nor
did it take into account who they were as an individual personalities.
The programme wasn't developed for them as I was taught to develop a programme
for the event, not the person. You are training for Taupo, then do this
"Taupo" programme. It became very obvious, very quickly that this had to
change. Why wasn't I getting the results I wanted? And why weren't
my riders either?
One of my
instigators for change was Tom Bricklebank. This hard, but caring veteran
could give any A-grader in Auckland a run for their money. I wrote him a
programme, and soon enough he was knocking at my door (with scones in tow)
asking me why I had got him to do this and that, and that's when I realized if
my performance was to change in coaching (and therefore the performance of my
riders) I had to change my methods, just the same as you if you want to
improve.
So now, I
establish what a riders weaknesses are, their goals, and where they are
relative to their goals. Then I set out a plan and a programme to achieve
those goals, and only write a small amount of training at a time, reviewing
every month and educating my riders what they are doing, and why they are doing
it. I ride with them or video them riding so they can improve technique.
Every method has to have a reason, or why do it?! This makes sure
everyone is on the incline of improvement. If a rider gets sick or
injured the programme changes, and I look at why they got sick or injured so as
to prevent it in the future. It is a holistic approach, it is very time
consuming for me, but it produces results. I tried writing four months,
here you go, see you then. While it was great for about 5% of the people
I helped, it didn't do much for the other 95%. A programme doesn't help
someone with race tactics, give them feedback on technique riding up a hill or
the results of each training session. A person does. And we seemed
to have got lost somewhere along the way that training for cycling is all about
the physical training. When in fact is it about; the individual, their
strengths and weaknesses, their work/life/training balance, their technique,
their recovery, their event or race tactics, their perception of their ability,
their willingness to get outside their comfort zone, their equipment, the time
of day they train, their nutrition, and the list goes on.
Now I would
say that the actual programme writing only accounts for 50% of what I do for
riders I work with. And that is what you need to consider when deciding
whether or not you want to improve by getting a coach. Buyer beware they
say in the retail industry and the same goes for coaching. Just because I
watch TV, doesn't mean I can produce TV programmes, and just because a rider
rides a bike, it doesn't instantly make them a coach. When you are
putting a lot of time (and money) into your cycling, and have goals to achieve,
you should make sure that the advice you are getting is sound. Check out
potential coaches and find out if they have knowledge in coaching, in training
science, and in cycling experience. All 3, not just one. Find out
if it is their part time job or hobby, or if they are full time. This
will dramatically affect your ability to get hold of them, ask questions, or
ease of access to see them. Unfortunately we do not have a validation
process here in NZ whereby you can check to see if a coach is registered and
approved as good enough to work with riders, like Master Builders or registers
for teachers, but hopefully this will come in the future.
Recently a
veteran rider I work with said to me. "You know Amy I thought I had
reached my potential, but over the last 7 weeks I have improved more than I
have in seven years, and I am now excited again that I can see I still have a
lot more potential left in me." We all have potential, no matter your
starting point or how long we've been in the sport. We just have to
surround ourselves with the resources to instigate change. In
cycling, once you've pimped out your equipment, a coach is the next step.
We may not be as sleek or shiny as a carbon wheel set, but we can make you go
faster.
Amy Taylor is an
Exercise Physiologist and Cycling Coach. The founder of Kinetic Edge
Cycling Coaching, she was Cycling New Zealand's Personal Coach and Overall
Coach of the Year in 2007 and author of the "Lake
Taupo Cycle Challenge Guide." Kinetic Edge can be contacted on
09 368 7819.

Amy Taylor's Lake Taupo Cycle Challenge Guide is available in the RideStrong shop at discounted rates for members.
Posted
05-02-2009 12:11 p.m.
by
Amy Taylor